This minimalist
documentary opens with brilliant shots of nature: canyons, sand dunes, and crashing
waves, to name a few. Directory Godfrey Reggio’s images depict the majesty of
nature and each frame commands respect. The shots however, do have a rather
ominous feel. The coinciding music assists in portraying nature as a
formidable, mighty force. There is a frightening power in the billowing waves and
the sweeping clouds. Slowly and surely the focus of the film transitions to
humans and destruction. There is a type of progression suggesting that first
there is nature, then the destruction of nature, and lastly human life, as we
know it. Time-lapse sequences show different forms of human behavior over a
period of time and patterns emerge. Philip Glass’ accompanying music – constant
and drilling – adds a sense of agitation and urgency to the actions.

Since I did not have the best experience with his contribution to Koyaanisqatsi, I did some exploring to see which, if any, of Philip Glass' music I might like. Being a dancer, I was interested to see if Philip Glass' work had ever been used in ballet. It turns out his music has been used by a few well-known choreographers, which was exciting for me to discover. I found that the prestigious San Francisco Ballet performed a work called Glass Pieces by Jerome Robbins in which the fourth and fifth movements of Glass' six movement chamber composition, Glassworks, was used. The video below is of the company performing the piece with Glass' Rubric and Facades in the background.
Hi, Sar. I loved to hear about your experience watching this film. Just like with Plastic Planet, where viewers finished the film and immediately noticed the massive amount of plastic in the room, you saw the message of Koyaanisqatsi in action in your own life. I also enjoyed reading about how you branched out and expanded your knowledge of Philip Glass. The video you posted was an interesting, new way to look at Glass' work. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteI had a very similar experience watching this film, I had a hard time focusing and understanding it. I understand that Reggio was trying to send his message through the audiences reaction, but he did it in a way that really bothered me. Besides just having a bad reaction I didn't really understand the film at all. His message is good but he could have done a much better job at it.
ReplyDelete