When
I began viewing this documentary, which takes a look at the build up to and
causes of the current economic recession, I was afraid it would be a boring,
complex, and confusing take on an issue which I already found difficult to
fully comprehend. However, the film successfully gave me a basis for
understanding the crisis. Director Charles Ferguson combined many varying
interviews with easy-to-understand visuals – for those of us that aren’t
economic wizzes. I felt as though I was being taken on a journey from the years
prior to the crash up to the present (or nearly so, as the film was made in
2010). What I witnessed was shocking.
Economic
Liberals are in favor of more regulation on the free market, and there is
evident economically liberal bias in this film. The director focuses on the
negative consequences of such little regulation of the banking industry’s
behavior. However, I still thought the argument was very thoroughly expressed.
Ferguson not only criticized both the Bush and Obama administrations instead of
favoring one over the other, but he also left out the political affiliations of
all subjects of the film. Ferguson made sure to note that when he was speaking
about a specific individual’s less than moral behavior, the individual would
not agree to be interviewed for the film. He did not simply show one side and
condemn the other. Ferguson did interview a few people who were directly
involved, and was insistent about receiving answers. Some may argue that he was
too combative with his interviewees and that a line needed to be drawn, but in
a situation where the events are laid out in black and white, I appreciated his
determination to wheedle out some truth.
It is clear to me that the sole force driving
the investment banking industry is GREED. To quote the Grinch, “the avarice!
The avarice never ends!” But really, in all seriousness it is disgusting how
the powerful, influential, big shots of the economic and banking worlds
manipulate the goings on for their own benefit. They knowingly make bad loan
investments with people who they are aware will likely never be able to pay
them back, and then bet against them. They rate bad loans with high grades so
as to convince their borrower. Then when the borrowers cannot pay back the
money, the bankers still make money
off of them. It’s sick. These men and women reap enormous benefits from their
jobs. I was absolutely flabbergasted to discover that when the economic bubble
popped, CEOs, CFOs, etc. simply resigned and were PAID OFF. Their punishments
for fraud were their multi-million dollar severance checks. The vast majority
of these conniving “businessmen” never went on trial for their corruption, and
even some – as seen in appointments by both Bush and Obama – were rewarded for
their cunning thievery.
I
don’t want greedy, self-interested, dishonest, slime-balls controlling the
Federal Reserve. I don’t want to pay taxes to bail out banks that were the
causes of their own destruction. Why should we have to clean up their mess?
Honestly I am so angry; I’m finding it difficult to articulately continue. I
was perhaps most appalled to discover that for the right price, prestigious
economics professors from ivy-league universities who must have known the dangers of the inflating bubble, have been
recruited to write papers to support the banks and deny any issues with the
lack of regulation! To hear some of these figures attempting to defend
themselves was pathetic. There is no excuse. Why did they do it? Simple. They
wanted another condo in Hawaii, a private jet, a yacht, or hell, a "high class" prostitute. There is no
legitimate defense. Similarly, watching the few court appearances of some of
the employees of Goldman Sachs and other banks was laughable. These men and
women who have spend their careers on a power trip, are reduced to the
despicable, thieving, scum they are, practically whimpering their feeble
responses. The inherent manipulation, gluttony, self-indulgence, and blatant
disregard for anyone but themselves, is abhorrent and unconscionable.
Extremely powerful conclusion, Sarala! I have to say that I really agree with you. I think the film depicts the economy and the people involved in an easy to understand fashion and I like that he left out the political parties. This issue is important, and it's nice to see the economy put into terms I can actually understand.
ReplyDelete